[ns] NS manual to wiki
Tom Henderson
tomh at tomh.org
Wed Dec 31 11:25:29 PST 2008
Lachlan Andrew wrote:
> Greetings Tom,
>
> It seems you're right that the main problem with maintaining the manual
> is apathy rather than access, judging by the deafening silence in
> response from your request for responses.
>
> In that case, how can I get access to the manual to fix some of the errors?
The manual is written in Latex and is in the source distribution in the
doc/ directory. You can send documentation patches to me, or if you
want to become a regular maintainer of this so you can commit changes
yourself, please contact me.
>
> Also, would it be possible to have a "beta" version of the manual as
> well as the "stable" version? That might help to push it towards the
> wiki ideal of a work-in-continual-progress, without the labour of
> changing the mark-up.
>
> The beta could have both new contributions from newbies, to be checked
> for accuracy by the veterans before inclusion, and also annotation such
> as requests for clarification and draft documentation of new features.
>
Yes, we could have a version posted that corresponded to the latest
released version, and a "development" version that would become the
release version for the next release.
The current development version is already built nightly and posted here:
http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/doc/index.html
By the way, anyone who wants to post patches, bugs, documentation
patches, etc. is welcome to upload them to the nsnam (ns-2 and nam-1)
tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=149743
- Tom
More information about the Ns-users
mailing list