[ns] TCP/FullTcp/Newreno Vs. TCP/Newreno
Renata Vidal
rs.renatavidal at gmail.com
Fri Jun 16 06:29:52 PDT 2006
I didn't read the RFC yeat, but is there some modification in newreno? (
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3782.txt) Is there any comments in .cc header
files?
There are a lot of working groups about congestion and avoidance... there is
some difference about it in one of them (look for DCCP).
Regards, Renata
On 6/16/06, Siddharth Ramesh <sid.ramesh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
> I was using FullTcp/Newreno agent and found that it behaved differently
> from
> the normal TCP/Newreno in terms of congestion control. I am really not
> sure
> about what is causing the difference. This difference is especially
> obvious
> when the number of flows sharing a bottleneck link becomes high - the
> FullTcp flows were performing much better in terms of the throughputs
> achieved.
>
> Anybody has any clue as to why this is happening?
> Thanks,
> Sid
>
--
Renata Vidal
"Triste é o destino de quem tenta vencer as batalhas e ter sucesso nos
ataques sem cultivar o espírito da iniciativa (A Arte da Guerra – SUN TSU –
pg 102)"
More information about the Ns-users
mailing list