[ns] R: two equal UDP CBR flows in droptail queue get different bandwidths?
Marco Fiore
fl0wer at virgilio.it
Wed Jun 7 06:39:58 PDT 2006
Eduardo,
it could be a synchronization issue.
Try to avoid
synchronization between flows
by setting the random flag of the cbr
flows
to true: "$cbr_name set random_ 1".
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>----
Messaggio originale----
>Da: ejortegau at cable.net.co
>Data: 7-giu-2006
3.00 PM
>A: <ns-users at ISI.EDU>
>Ogg: [ns] two equal UDP CBR flows in
droptail queue get different bandwidths?
>
>
>Hi there:
>
>I've set up
this experiment. I have two source nodes S1 and S2 directly
>connected
to a node R1 and two destination nodes D1 and D2 also directly
>connected to a node R2. Nodes R1 and R2 are connected. All links are 1
Mb/s
>Full duplex with DropTail. Now, here's the thing. I set up two
flows, one
>going from S1 to D1 and the other one form S2 to D2. Both
flows are UDP CBR 1
>Mb/s. Flow 1 starts at t=0 and finishes at t=20.
flow 2 starts at t=10 and
>stops at t=15. Sim runs from t=0 to t=25.
>
>I'd expect that at t=10 (when flow 2 starts), both flows would
experience the
>same amount of packet losses, so that each one would
use about 0.5Mb/s of the
>link between R1 and R2. But what really
happens is that from t=10 to t=15,
>flow 2 uses all bandwidth while
flow 1 loses all packets. Since both flows
>have the same parameters,
shouldn't they receive the same share of bandwidth
>during that
period? Or am i missing something here?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>--
>Eduardo J. Ortega - Linux user #222873
>"No fake - I'm a big fan of
konqueror, and I use it for everything." -- Linus
>Torvalds
>
>
More information about the Ns-users
mailing list