[ns] validity of routing protocol comparison

[Pedro Estrela]

Hello

Are you using hierarquical addresses? 

If yes, beware that conversion to flat addresses is buggy, being this
important for large simulations; see my recent post on this subject.

If No, I believe that TG gives fairly good & accurate results for large
simulations.

Pedro Estrela


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ns-users-bounces at ISI.EDU [mailto:ns-users-bounces at ISI.EDU] On
Behalf
> Of Vin
> Sent: quinta-feira, 22 de Janeiro de 2004 23:01
> To: ns-users at ISI.EDU
> Subject: [ns] validity of routing protocol comparison
> 
> 
> Hi all. I am comparing some routing protcols and was
> hoping someone can confirm if what i am doing is
> correct.
> 
> I keep only the router trace ON and others level
> traces off.
> 
> I use tracegraph on my files which simulate for 100
> nodes,500 sec simulation time and over 50 connections.
> 
> Has tracegraph proved reliable for such large files( I
> see a message that 1000 lines have been
> processes.whats that?)?
> 
> Plz let me know if i am doing somethign wrong above
> which could give me incorrect results.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Vinod
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/