[ns] validity of routing protocol comparison
pedro.estrela at inesc.pt
Fri Jan 23 07:56:30 PST 2004
Are you using hierarquical addresses?
If yes, beware that conversion to flat addresses is buggy, being this
important for large simulations; see my recent post on this subject.
If No, I believe that TG gives fairly good & accurate results for large
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ns-users-bounces at ISI.EDU [mailto:ns-users-bounces at ISI.EDU] On
> Of Vin
> Sent: quinta-feira, 22 de Janeiro de 2004 23:01
> To: ns-users at ISI.EDU
> Subject: [ns] validity of routing protocol comparison
> Hi all. I am comparing some routing protcols and was
> hoping someone can confirm if what i am doing is
> I keep only the router trace ON and others level
> traces off.
> I use tracegraph on my files which simulate for 100
> nodes,500 sec simulation time and over 50 connections.
> Has tracegraph proved reliable for such large files( I
> see a message that 1000 lines have been
> processes.whats that?)?
> Plz let me know if i am doing somethign wrong above
> which could give me incorrect results.
> Thanks in advance,
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
More information about the Ns-users