[ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
Sun, 9 Jul 2000 16:01:46 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Haobo Yu wrote:
> latency = propagation delay + transmission delay (ignore queueing delay).
> you set transmission delay to 0
he's setting link _propagation_ delay to 0, surely?
remaining time is time of packet transmission, dependent on
(packet length)/(link bandwidth).
and fudged a bit for headers etc.
> but you still have the former. See
> Peterson and Davie's networking book...
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Antonello wrote:
> > hi, I'm facing a very strange problem: if I create a simplelink or duplexlink
> > with no delay (0 ms), analyzing the tracefile I expected that th differnece
> > between the 'r' event and '-' event is th transmission time...but it is not
> > so...why?