[Ns-developers] 802.11s code review

[Pavel Boyko]

  Dear Gustavo and Ruben,  

On Monday 16 March 2009 21:31:45 you wrote:
> Yep, I agree too. There should be a clear distinction between what is
> really standard compliant (i.e. defined in the standard) and what is (a)
> inferred from the standard because it was not clearly defined in the
> standard (b) research stuff.

  Right, this is exactly what keeps us busy now, I am sorry for confusing you. 
After refactoring we'll have 'devices/mesh' module with a protocol independent 
framework for level 2 mesh and 'devices/mesh/802.11s' module implementing .11s 
draft protocols. Our research stuff (and this _is_ the thing we are really 
interested in :) is supposed to appear then as 'devices/mesh/foo', 
'devices/mesh/bar', etc. modules. Is that ok? 

  Regards,
  Pavel