[Ns-developers] CreateObject and non-default constructors

[Mathieu Lacage]

On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 15:45 +0100, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:

> 
> Additionally, I would like to keep Python bindings simpler than C++,
> which means we just call Class(...) constructor and behind the scenes
> the wrapper code calls CreateObjectWhatever.  With that framework in
> mind, it becomes difficult to support both types of parameters at the
> same time without making one of the alternatives uglier.

I think that it's ok to make one of the alternatives ugly. Preferably,
the least used one.
> 
> So, in Python bindings side, nothing will change with a+b patches.  Is
> that OK?

yes.

Mathieu