[Ns-developers] tag rework for next release
Tom Henderson
tomh at tomh.org
Fri Jun 5 13:52:44 PDT 2009
Mathieu Lacage wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 23:01 -0700, Tom Henderson wrote:
>
>>>> One thing that I noticed is that packet tags are left out of the
>>>> Packet::Serialize() process (while byte tags are included). This is a
>>>> bit subtle, but it basically means that packets that are sent to another
>>>> node via an ns-3 channel will retain packet tags but if that ns-3
>>>> channel happens to utilize a real IP tunnel (in a distributed simulation
>>>> use case) the packet tags will be stripped.
>
> The ns-3-tags code does not serialize _any_ tag (byte or packet) for now
> which is a deficiency but which is not a problem for now because no one
> is doing a distributed simulation (for now).
>
>>>> It seems like we ought to support packet tags in Serialize, but is there
>>>> a reason why not?
>>> Lazyness: I can fix this late next week but feel free to beat me to it.
>> What is the status of serializing tags? I see this in the code:
>
> I did not see the point of trying to address a problem which already
> exists in ns-3-dev. Filing a bug about this separate issue to track it
> seems like the right thing to do. See bug 582.
I support merging this with the open bug. I will send you separately a
patch with manual fixes.
- Tom
More information about the Ns-developers
mailing list