[Ns-developers] About 802.11 management frame

[Mirko Banchi]

Basim Javed ha scritto:
> hi
> 
> If I correctly understand the situation, I may add:
> The concept of TXOP is limited for a given STA which has already won
> contention; so there is no chance that "The Ap should send an Association
> Response frame. But should this happen in the same TxOp? ". The AP will have
> its own TXOP, which may enable sending one response frame only.
> 
> regards
> B

Yes, you are right. I use improperly the term TXOP to intend:
the exchange of four frames:

AssocReq
Ack
AssocResp
Ack

is "atomic"?

However i'm persuasing that could be not atomic even if i don't
understand what standards intends when speak about "its response" (see
section 7.1.4 point a2)

Thanks,

Mirko


-- 
Mirko Banchi

e-mail:    mk.banchi at gmail.com
e-mail:    mk.banchi at virgilio.it
id-jabber: mk.banchi at jabber.org
id-msn:    mb11684 at hotmail.com

PGP key fingerprint:

308F BFB1 4E67 2522 C88E
DC69 7631 52ED 32A5 6456

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3410 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/ns-developers/attachments/20090421/b1f3f3d9/smime.bin