[Ns-developers] Design Review of ns-3-ipv6-1st (ns-3.3 newfeature)
Tom Henderson
tomh at tomh.org
Mon Nov 3 06:57:54 PST 2008
craigdo at ee.washington.edu wrote:
>> At this point, my main concern is that I would like to know what the
>> plan is to deal with the ipv4 API rework under way in tom's
>> tree.
>
> I agree completely. I just spoke to Tom about this. We agree that the approach to take is to have Tom "adopt" Sebastien's changes
> and merge them into his IPv4 work. This will ensure that the two feature sets work together consistently, and will allow reviewing
> them as one consistent whole (which makes reviewer's lives easier).
>
> Logistically, this seems to mean that we "withdraw" the ns-3-ipv6-1st feature proposal and allow Tom and Sebastien to coordinate how
> to merge it into the IPv4 rework feature proposal. We will then see an IPv4, IPv6 rework feature proposal appear Real Soon Now.
>
Craig, I'm going to withdraw trying to put IPv4 routing rework into
ns-3.3, since there is still a lot of work to do, and it would make
sense to try to deal with the IPv6 at the same time.
I would still be in favor of merging Sebastien's first repository on
Ipv6 addressing (without the routing component) for ns-3.3, and try to
get the routing component done for ns-3.4.
Tom
More information about the Ns-developers
mailing list