[Ns-developers] Status of Python bindings

Mathieu Lacage mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr
Sat May 17 08:22:49 PDT 2008


On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 12:06 +0100, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:

>         
>         Well, I think you got it right the first time.  I won't cry
>         about it too much ;-)
> 
> This didn't come out right.  Sorry, I've been sick the last few days
> and not in a good mood :(
> 
> If you want to convince Mathieu that (returntype, name, params) is
> better, I'll change it back.  If you are unsure, as I am, then I would
> rather leave it as it is.  I really really hate API changes, in case
> you haven't noticed... :P

If you and craig agree, feel free to ignore me.

>         > Regarding returntype mandatory, fine by me; I'll keep it.
>         
>         
>         I think that was the real issue under discussion.
> 
> About this, I was thinking of simplifying it slightly.  Instead of
> ReturnValue.new('void'), None would also work equivalently.  Does it
> sound OK?

It does sound ok.

Mathieu



More information about the Ns-developers mailing list