[Ns-developers] Status of Python bindings
Mathieu Lacage
mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr
Sat May 17 08:22:49 PDT 2008
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 12:06 +0100, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
>
> Well, I think you got it right the first time. I won't cry
> about it too much ;-)
>
> This didn't come out right. Sorry, I've been sick the last few days
> and not in a good mood :(
>
> If you want to convince Mathieu that (returntype, name, params) is
> better, I'll change it back. If you are unsure, as I am, then I would
> rather leave it as it is. I really really hate API changes, in case
> you haven't noticed... :P
If you and craig agree, feel free to ignore me.
> > Regarding returntype mandatory, fine by me; I'll keep it.
>
>
> I think that was the real issue under discussion.
>
> About this, I was thinking of simplifying it slightly. Instead of
> ReturnValue.new('void'), None would also work equivalently. Does it
> sound OK?
It does sound ok.
Mathieu
More information about the Ns-developers
mailing list