[Ns-developers] Status of Python bindings

[Gustavo Carneiro]

2008/5/17 <craigdo at ee.washington.edu>:

>
> > Sorry, I changed from (returntype, funcname, parameters) to
> > (funcname, returntype, parameters) following Mathieu's
> > suggestion.  You didn't say anything before and now it's too
> > late.  Sorry.
>
> Well, I think you got it right the first time.  I won't cry about it too
> much ;-)


This didn't come out right.  Sorry, I've been sick the last few days and not
in a good mood :(

If you want to convince Mathieu that (returntype, name, params) is better,
I'll change it back.  If you are unsure, as I am, then I would rather leave
it as it is.  I really really hate API changes, in case you haven't
noticed... :P


>
>
> > Regarding returntype mandatory, fine by me; I'll keep it.
>
> I think that was the real issue under discussion.


About this, I was thinking of simplifying it slightly.  Instead of
ReturnValue.new('void'), None would also work equivalently.  Does it sound
OK?

-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit
"The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert