[Ns-developers] Status of Python bindings

[Gustavo Carneiro]

[...]

>
>  - Function (return_type, name, args) -> Function (name, return_type,
> args). The same would hold for add_cpp_method, of course.


It occurred to me, since we're making API changes, would this look to
strange to you:

    Function (name, args, return_type)

This would allow me to make the return_type parameter optional, which would
be equivalent to void, and so simplify considerably definition of functions
which do not return anything.  It would also make the ordering more in line
with UML method description, which are like:

   +methodName(parameters): return_type

-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit
"The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert