[Ns-developers] [ns3] logging proposal
Tom Henderson
tomh at tomh.org
Sun Apr 20 22:34:32 PDT 2008
Mathieu Lacage wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 22:54 +0100, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
>>
>> On 15/04/2008, Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 22:35 +0100, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
>>
>> > Do you think NS_LOG_FUNCTION_AND_ARGS is too
>> verbose? Alternatively,
>> > rename your NS_LOG_FUNCTION0 to NS_LOG_FUNCTION_NOARGS.
>>
>>
>> NS_LOG_FUNCTION_NOARGS looks bearable. Shall I give it
>> 'function' syntax
>> or not ?
>>
>> I'd say not, but don't really care much either way.
>
> I forgot to say so but this is not implemented in ns-3-log which looks
> like it is ready to be merged so, unless there are dissenting voices
> soon, I will probably merge tomorrow.
>
Mathieu, this looks to me like it is in good shape, so I support merging
it. Thanks for supporting the suggested timestamp on log entries.
Tom
More information about the Ns-developers
mailing list