[Ns-developers] [ns3] logging proposal

[Mathieu Lacage]

On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 22:35 +0100, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:

> Do you think NS_LOG_FUNCTION_AND_ARGS is too verbose?  Alternatively,
> rename your NS_LOG_FUNCTION0 to NS_LOG_FUNCTION_NOARGS. 

NS_LOG_FUNCTION_NOARGS looks bearable. Shall I give it 'function' syntax
or not ?

> 
> Else I'm out of ideas... :-/
> 
> But NS_LOG_PARAMETERS outputing function name is bit surprising IMHO,
> and we should strive to reduce the amount of surprises.

agreed.