[Ns-developers] some ns-3 documentation proposals
mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr
Thu Dec 13 23:34:30 PST 2007
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 17:00 -0800, craigdo at ee.washington.edu wrote:
> > I think that it would be probably much easier to
> > just move everything to doxygen, including the
> > tutorial.
> I'm in the process of converting the remaining tutorial pieces to .texi and
> adding a bunch more content *now*, so I would hate to see another change of
> direction while I'm still in the middle of changing from the old direction.
> In the long run, I'd be fine moving everything to Doxygen if it can do what
> we want. Having a single model for documentation appeals to my internal
I believe it can. If you can point me to the texi source you have, I can
verify that dox has the matching tags.
> need for logic, consistency, and a simple book of instructions. I'll be
> perfectly happy to go with whatever markup language we want -- I have no
> religious constraints. However, as someone I know has said in the past,
> "let's just make a decision and stick with it." :-/
Agreed. I am clearly to blame for not answering tom's emails about this
and suggesting we stick to a single tool before :/
More information about the Ns-developers