[Ns-bugs] [Bug 486] Patches for compilation with icc

[code@nsnam.ece.gatech.edu]

http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=486





--- Comment #9 from Rajib Bhattacharjea <raj.b at gatech.edu>  2009-02-05 14:26:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> 
> 
> This chunk worries me.  You are removing the default parameter values; how does
> this not break existing code?
> 

As far as I know, the standard says that default parameters should only go in
the signature of the specification of the method, not in the implementation. 
Although putting them in the implementation signature improves readability (and
GCC allows it), it is not C++ standard.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.