[Ns-bugs] [Bug 339] Unconditional assert API proposed
bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu
Fri Sep 12 10:11:16 PDT 2008
------- Comment #5 from raj.b at gatech.edu 2008-09-12 13:11 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > There are 80 instances of NS_FATAL_ERROR (msg) now, though.
> _Please_ I beg you, do not even consider to change NS_FATAL_ERROR. Blasphemy!
> No more gratuitous API breakage please :|
> How about NS_ABORT_IF (condition, message) ? I don't think you can't get a
> much more explicit name than that...
The fatal error and assert macros are for developer use, completely internally
to the ns-3 codebase. Why are you concerned with API breakage here? I'd be
surpised if a "user" even knew these macros existed.
It would however be some sed work to change things.
+1 to Craig's suggestion, for inclusion in ns-3.3
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the Ns-bugs