[Ns-bugs] [Bug 120] PacketSink should be named PacketSinkApplication

[bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu]

http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120





------- Comment #4 from tomh at tomh.org  2008-04-17 09:10 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't care much about this so, I would like to propose to settle with the
> current code. I will close the bug as WONTFIX tomorrow if I don't get feedback.
> 

I also do not care strongly which is why I haven't rushed to patch it.  It
seemed to me that class names could get long by doing this, and that
Application is understood from the context if good class names are chosen, but
I understand that we have this convention elsewhere such as NetDevice.  Maybe a
litmus test is whether the class name makes sense without the suffix (e.g.,
"PacketSink" could stand alone, but "OnOff" probably does not).

WONTFIX is fine with me.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.