From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Wed Aug 1 00:48:21 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:48:21 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 59] Debugging output should go to stderr, not stdout
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59
mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #2 from mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr 2007-08-01 03:48 -------
applied.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Wed Aug 1 02:38:36 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:38:36 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 60] New: trace system depends on non-standard memory
management
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60
Summary: trace system depends on non-standard memory management
Product: ns-3
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: simulation core
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr
the tracing system depends on a non-standard memory management solution: it
depends on each CreateTraceResolver function to return a newed resolver which
must be deleted by the caller. This was before the days when we invented nsCOM
so, we should consider switching the tracing infrastructure to a refcounted
Ptr-based model.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 05:13:10 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:13:10 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 7] Better breakpoints
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #5 from mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr 2007-08-02 08:13 -------
please, apply.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 05:59:32 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:59:32 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 7] Better breakpoints
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 06:36:57 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:36:57 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 61] New: RandomVariable::UseGlobalSeed too permissive
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61
Summary: RandomVariable::UseGlobalSeed too permissive
Product: ns-3
Version: pre-release
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: simulation core
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: gjcarneiro at gmail.com
void RandomVariable::UseGlobalSeed(uint32_t s0, uint32_t s1, uint32_t s2,
uint32_t s3, uint32_t s4, uint32_t s5)
{
if (RandomVariable::globalSeedSet)
{
cout << "Random number generator already initialized!" << endl;
cout << "Call to RandomVariable::UseGlobalSeed() ignored" << endl;
return;
}
These cout's should probably just become a NS_FATAL_ERROR...
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:01:29 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:01:29 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 51] Allow UDP sockets to receive broadcast
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #3 from gjcarneiro at gmail.com 2007-08-02 10:01 -------
This is already merged.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:02:09 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:02:09 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 36] Support IPv4 broadcast (255.255.255.255)
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #22 from gjcarneiro at gmail.com 2007-08-02 10:02 -------
merged
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:05:46 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:05:46 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 49] Ipv4: add automatic routes to interfaces'
networks
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #3 from gjcarneiro at gmail.com 2007-08-02 10:05 -------
Already merged.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:06:51 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:06:51 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 26] Old C++ compilers are unable to parse
component-manager.h
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |minor
OS/Version|Linux |All
Platform|PC |All
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:08:06 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:08:06 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 46] A Timer class
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |enhancement
OS/Version|Linux |All
Platform|PC |All
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:08:44 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:08:44 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 61] RandomVariable::UseGlobalSeed too permissive
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |trivial
OS/Version|Linux |All
Platform|PC |All
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:11:46 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:11:46 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 32] Add a Simulation::CancelByClassPointer (T
*classInstance) method
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gjcarneiro at gmail.com
Severity|blocker |enhancement
------- Comment #1 from gjcarneiro at gmail.com 2007-08-02 10:11 -------
My EventCollectorClass in [1] tris to solve this problem in a different way.
http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-olsr-support/file/190372a33951/src/simulator/event-collector.h
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:14:31 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:14:31 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 40] Samples/Examples linked shared sometimes do
nothing or hang
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
------- Comment #3 from gjcarneiro at gmail.com 2007-08-02 10:14 -------
Is this is fixed already? I mean, this is the problem of the DLLs not having
the ns3 prefix, right? If so, should be fixed now. If it's another problem
then by all means leave it open.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:15:44 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:15:44 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 58] Simulator::Remove and Simulator::IsExpired are
not safe together
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #2 from gjcarneiro at gmail.com 2007-08-02 10:15 -------
fix was merged recently
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:16:57 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:16:57 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 60] trace system depends on non-standard memory
management
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |minor
OS/Version|Linux |All
Platform|PC |All
------- Comment #1 from gjcarneiro at gmail.com 2007-08-02 10:16 -------
Hardly a blocker...
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:18:20 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:18:20 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 33] Add a Simulator::DisableSchedule method
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |enhancement
OS/Version|Linux |All
Platform|PC |All
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Thu Aug 2 07:19:16 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:19:16 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 34] ip checksum calculation is disabled
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
gjcarneiro at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |normal
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 3 11:40:19 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:40:19 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 40] Samples/Examples linked shared sometimes do
nothing or hang
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
------- Comment #4 from tomh at tomh.org 2007-08-03 14:40 -------
The prefix fix led to the discovery of another problem with shared libraries in
Cygwin, where Craig initiated a small private thread on the topic:
"The problem is that a lot of other code relies on this specific c++
usage pattern where a class static member method contains a
function-scope static variable and we really cannot convert these
function-scope static variables to class static member variables because
of the initialization ordering problems I alluded to earlier. And even
if we did this, we would have to do this dreadful macro game to avoid
multiple definitions."
Mathieu told me that he is looking at solutions to this problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Sun Aug 5 21:48:09 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:48:09 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 62] New: naming of methods in DefaultValue
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62
Summary: naming of methods in DefaultValue
Product: ns-3
Version: pre-release
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: simulation core
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: tomh at tomh.org
This is a carryover from the global routing discussion.
>
> >> - along the same lines, Bind() is kind of an oddball in the present
> >> system. We do NodeList::Begin (), Simulator::Run (),
> >> CommandLine::Parse (); but simply Bind (). This isn't consistent.
> >>
> >> (note: the choice of "bind()" was due to ns-2's methods of the same name)
> >>
> >> Perhaps it would be better to do something like,
> >>
> >> Configurator::Set ("DoStaticRouting", "true");
> >>
> >> if (Configurator::IsEqual ("DoStaticRouting", "true"))
> >> {
> >> }
>
>Maybe it would make sense to try to stick the ns-2 naming scheme and use
>DefaultValue::Bind and DefaultValue::IsBound ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Sun Aug 5 21:49:39 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:49:39 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 63] New: flag needed in an internet node to
distinguish routers from hosts
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63
Summary: flag needed in an internet node to distinguish routers
from hosts
Product: ns-3
Version: pre-release
Platform: All
OS/Version: Mac OS
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: routing
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: tomh at tomh.org
discussion from the list:
>> - whether to add some kind of flag in an InternetNode that is equivalent
>> >> to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward , so that every InternetNode is not
>> >> necessarily a router.
> >
> >What is the use-case for that ? Is it not enough to not create a
> >forwarding table for that node ? If not, I suspect that we could
> >trivially add:
> >
> >Ipv4::EnableForwarding ()
> >Ipv4::DisableForwarding ()
> >Ipv4::IsForwardingEnabled ()
> >
> >
Issue left for further study.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Sun Aug 5 21:51:33 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:51:33 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 64] New: whether routing API needs to be split from
Ipv4 API
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64
Summary: whether routing API needs to be split from Ipv4 API
Product: ns-3
Version: pre-release
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: routing
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: tomh at tomh.org
discussion from the list:
>> - whether to continue to write to the existing IPv4 API or load a static
>> >> router component into the node such as Gustavo's OLSR code does
> >
> >I am not sure I understand what the alternatives are here: the routing
> >code should be written to use our public Ipv4 API, without doubt.
Whether to split off the IPv4 API into a routing API is an issue left for
further study.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Sun Aug 5 21:52:42 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:52:42 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 65] New: mapping functions needed in Ipv4 between IP
addresses, net devices, and ifIndexes
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65
Summary: mapping functions needed in Ipv4 between IP addresses,
net devices, and ifIndexes
Product: ns-3
Version: pre-release
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: internet-node
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: tomh at tomh.org
There are still two methods that probably should eventually be moved to the
Ipv4 code:
uint32_t GlobalRouter::FindIfIndexForDevice (Ptr node, Ptr
nd) const;
uint32_t GlobalRouteManagerImpl::FindOutgoingInterfaceId (Ipv4Address a);
Basically, there probably is a more general need residing in the Ipv4 API to
lookup mappings between IP addresses, net devices, and IfIndexes. For now, we
leave it in this code.
> >
> >
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Sun Aug 5 21:54:14 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:54:14 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 66] New: improve granularity of
GlobalRouteManager::PopulateRoutes
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66
Summary: improve granularity of
GlobalRouteManager::PopulateRoutes
Product: ns-3
Version: pre-release
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: routing
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: tomh at tomh.org
Mathieu's suggestion to provide a list of nodes that restricts the set of nodes
for which PopulateRoutes is invoked:
> / by default, configure routing in _all_ nodes
> >void StaticRouteManager::PopulateRoutes (void);
> >
> >// configure routing in only the nodes
> >// identified by the input interators begin and end.
> >template
> >void StaticRouteManager::PopulateRoutes (InputIterator begin,
> >InputIterator end);
this InputIterator refinement is not yet done.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Tue Aug 7 07:48:20 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:48:20 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 67] New: separation of TCP and IP headers
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67
Summary: separation of TCP and IP headers
Product: ns-3
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: feature-request
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: internet-node
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: toby.moncaster at bt.com
We have been working on writing NS2 models of network-layer congestion control
protocols. One of the problems we have encountered is that NS2 doesn't properly
separate the functionality of TCP and IP and in particular doesn't correctly
separate their headers.
Can I just check whether there is the intention to do thiings differently in
NS3? It would be far easier for our simulaiton models if we were able to
directly manipulate the IP and TCP headers at the bit level. The nearest NS2
currently seems to get to this is the tcp_flags field in tcp.h It would be good
if this approach could be repeated for all the header fields in both TCp and IP
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Tue Aug 7 21:08:19 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:08:19 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 67] separation of TCP and IP headers
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67
tomh at tomh.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #1 from tomh at tomh.org 2007-08-08 00:08 -------
Toby,
If you want to follow up on this discussion, please send it to ns-developers
list.
we do plan to have more faithful representation of transport and IP headers in
ns-3. the packet format is natively serialized for emulation, so you should
have access to change whatever fields you want, but typically through a C++
class that provides access methods on the header fields. Actually, the current
code in ns-3-dev for Ipv4 and UDP should show an example of this.
Here is some more on the ns-3 packet design:
http://www.nsnam.org/docs/architecture/node25.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Wed Aug 8 04:17:36 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:17:36 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 56] [patch] proposed global rename of p2p to
"point-to-point"
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56
mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #4 from mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr 2007-08-08 07:17 -------
done.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Wed Aug 8 04:18:23 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:18:23 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 62] naming of methods in DefaultValue
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62
------- Comment #1 from mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr 2007-08-08 07:18 -------
Any opposition to DefaultValue::Bind and DefaultValue::IsBound ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Wed Aug 8 05:05:00 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:05:00 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 62] naming of methods in DefaultValue
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62
------- Comment #2 from mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr 2007-08-08 08:05 -------
Created an attachment (id=35)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35&action=view)
rename Bind to DefaultValue::Bind
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Wed Aug 8 05:05:36 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:05:36 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 62] naming of methods in DefaultValue
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62
------- Comment #3 from mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr 2007-08-08 08:05 -------
I did not implement IsBound since this would have required a few changes in a
lot of places and we do not need it right away.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Tue Aug 14 11:59:14 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:59:14 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 68] Ipv4Address::IsMulticast () is not implemented
correctly.
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68
craigdo at ee.washington.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Tue Aug 14 11:58:46 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:58:46 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 68] New: Ipv4Address::IsMulticast () is not
implemented correctly.
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68
Summary: Ipv4Address::IsMulticast () is not implemented
correctly.
Product: ns-3
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: node module
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: craigdo at ee.washington.edu
Ipv4Address::IsMulticast () always returns false.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Tue Aug 14 12:04:12 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:04:12 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 69] New: Source IP address is not set correctly
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69
Summary: Source IP address is not set correctly
Product: ns-3
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: internet-node
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: craigdo at ee.washington.edu
Packets sent (at least via sockets) have a source IP address of 0.0.0.0
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:47:43 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:47:43 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #2 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:47 -------
Created an attachment (id=36)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36&action=view)
butalbital
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:48:04 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:48:04 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #3 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=37)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37&action=view)
cialis
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:48:22 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:48:22 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #4 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=38)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38&action=view)
combivir
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:49:03 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:49:03 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #6 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=40)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40&action=view)
flomax
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:48:43 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:48:43 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #5 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=39)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39&action=view)
ditropan
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:49:23 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:49:23 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #7 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=41)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41&action=view)
flonase
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:49:48 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:49:48 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #8 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=42)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42&action=view)
strattera
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:50:31 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:50:31 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #10 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=44)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44&action=view)
ultram
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:50:11 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:50:11 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #9 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=43)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43&action=view)
tegretol
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 17 06:50:48 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:50:48 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 57] memory leak in packet metadata
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
------- Comment #11 from Odis at tfrmovies.com 2007-08-17 09:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=45)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45&action=view)
vaniqa
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Mon Aug 20 06:07:09 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:07:09 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 70] New: Eui48Address and Eui64Address are pretty
un-intuitive names
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70
Summary: Eui48Address and Eui64Address are pretty un-intuitive
names
Product: ns-3
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: node module
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: mathieu.lacage at sophia.inria.fr
despite being official IEEE names, the users I talk to look at me in a weird
way when they see this.
Proposal: rename to the IEEE-deprecated-but-vastly-more-meaningful Mac48Address
and Mac64Address
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Mon Aug 20 19:09:35 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:09:35 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 70] Eui48Address and Eui64Address are pretty
un-intuitive names
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70
------- Comment #1 from tomh at tomh.org 2007-08-20 22:09 -------
+1 (EUI can be in the API documentation)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Tue Aug 21 23:33:52 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:33:52 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 71] New: DEBUG function tracing issue needs resolved
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71
Summary: DEBUG function tracing issue needs resolved
Product: ns-3
Version: pre-release
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: simulation core
AssignedTo: ns-bugs at isi.edu
ReportedBy: tomh at tomh.org
multicast code has raised some open questions about the use of NS_DEBUG and
possible interaction with the tracing system:
- whether NS_DEBUG should be used widely to perform function call tracing for
debugging during model development
- whether traces such as function call tracing should be hooked into the
tracing system rather than the debug system
- whether function call tracing is explicit or automated (bozo-profiler)
- format of function call tracing including whether parameters are included and
also class namesaaa
- whether more granularity (per-node) is needed in filtering NS_DEBUGs printing
out
- whether NS_DEBUG messages should print out simulation time and possibly node
or object identifiers
- whether NS_DEBUG needs a few logging levels such as syslog warn, info, etc.
For instance: 1: function call/signature tracing, 2: return values, 3:
internal high-level logic of a routine such as an algorithm, 4: logic inside
for loops, etc.
Quote from Craig: "Assume for a moment that a debug trace facility is very
useful. We
currently have one based on macros with an on-off selector. We also have a
very powerful low-level tracing subystem. Does it make sense to integrate
the existing debug print / trace functionality into the tracing subsystem to
leverage some of the flexibility inherent in that system?"
"
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Wed Aug 22 23:26:44 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:26:44 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 69] Source IP address is not set correctly
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69
------- Comment #1 from tomh at tomh.org 2007-08-23 02:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=46)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46&action=view)
patch extracted from craigdo/ns-3-mc
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
From bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu Fri Aug 24 12:24:44 2007
From: bugzilla-daemon at nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu (bugzilla-daemon@nsnam-www.ece.gatech.edu)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:24:44 -0400
Subject: [Ns-bugs] [Bug 69] Source IP address is not set correctly
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69
------- Comment #2 from tjkopena at cs.drexel.edu 2007-08-24 15:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=47)
--> (http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47&action=view)
Additional patch for Source IP 0.0.0.0
Minor changes to UDPSocket to fix SendTo()/Connect() and 0 Source IP problems.
**Note that this requires Tom's patch for this be applied first.**
Changes include:
- Making source IP addresses be reoprted correctly when using SendTo()
- Enable using Connect() to provide optional defaults for Send(), overridden by
using SendTo()
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.nsnam.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.