[Csci551-talk] sample log file doubt

[Affan, Syed]

The reason being that all the replies are delayed by the delay amount
specified. Had that not been the case, the output would have been as you
suggested. The delay effect causes the batching of all replies. 

Best Regards,
Affan, Syed. 



-----Original Message-----
From: csci551-talk-bounces at mailman.isi.edu
[mailto:csci551-talk-bounces at mailman.isi.edu] On Behalf Of m
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:39 PM
To: csci551-talk at mailman.isi.edu
Subject: [Csci551-talk] sample log file doubt


1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 8
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 20
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 4
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 9
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 7
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 16
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 6
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 5
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	8
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	20
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	4
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	9
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	7
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	16
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	6
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	5


>From sample log file 1.out, node 0 requests 8 segments from node 1.
Node 1 sends all the requests at once which is correct. However, node 1
batched all the request and replies at once !? Is this correct? 
I think the log file of node 1 should be as shown below.
Any comment?

1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 8
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	 8
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 20
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	20
1111874886	 FROM	 0	CLNT_SEG_REQ	 foo	 4
1111874886	 TO  	0	CLNT_SEG_REP	 foo	4