[Csci551-talk] Random selections.
muhammad murtaza
mmurtaza at usc.edu
Wed Apr 20 19:28:48 PDT 2005
Hi,
In my view the solution of selecting the random segments first is better cuz , if u select the peers first, and then select random segments, it might turn out that u have that segment. And this situation can happen again n again if nodes need lesser packets to complete their files. So First selecting the segment will make sure that now u dont have to search for a segment but for a node having that segment, which usually is lot less a number than number of segments in a file. So it should be better.
AW
Zaki
----- Original Message -----
From: csci551-talk-request at mailman.isi.edu
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:00 pm
Subject: Csci551-talk Digest, Vol 9, Issue 13
> Send Csci551-talk mailing list submissions to
> csci551-talk at mailman.isi.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/csci551-talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> csci551-talk-request at mailman.isi.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> csci551-talk-owner at mailman.isi.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Csci551-talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Random selections. (rashmi chandrasekhar)
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:12:37 -0700
> From: rashmi chandrasekhar <rmchandr at usc.edu>
> Subject: [Csci551-talk] Random selections.
> To: csci551-talk at ISI.EDU
> Message-ID: <d6126505253b9.42652df5 at usc.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> For the 'R' algorithm, it has been suggested in the spec to select
> a random segment that is missing from the file and then randomly
> choose a peer that has the segment. This means we have to look
> into all peers' segments and choose the ones that have that
> segment and then make a random selection among them. Wouldnt it be
> better in terms of computation time if we choose a random peer
> first and then choose one of its segments randomly and download
> it if we still havent downloaded it ? Any suggestions ?
>
> -Rashmi.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csci551-talk mailing list
> Csci551-talk at mailman.isi.edu
> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/csci551-talk
>
>
> End of Csci551-talk Digest, Vol 9, Issue 13
> *******************************************
>
More information about the Csci551-talk
mailing list