[Csci551-talk] Project 2 bandwidth limit question

[Affan, Syed]

Very good question.. Yes, you need to do that, b/c we want to simulate
the packet loss on the link - not that the sender doesn't send it at all
:). 

Best Regards,
Affan, Syed. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Clarence Chung [mailto:cychung at gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 2:38 PM
To: Affan, Syed
Subject: Re: [Csci551-talk] Project 2 bandwidth limit question


If a node is dropping an out going message, should the node wait for the
tx delay for that message before sending out the next message?

clarence
 

On 4/12/05, Affan, Syed <asyed at usc.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
> You are right. Request and both reply need to be delayed in projb.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Affan, Syed.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: csci551-talk-bounces at mailman.isi.edu
> [mailto:csci551-talk-bounces at mailman.isi.edu] On Behalf Of Clarence 
> Chung
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 11:18 PM
> To: csci551-talk at mailman.isi.edu
> Subject: [Csci551-talk] Project 2 bandwidth limit question
> 
> I believe in Project A, the simulation of transmission delay is 
> applied ONLY to "REPLY" message, but not "REQUEST" messages. Now in 
> Project B, from looking at the example given at the end of section 2, 
> it seems like the delay applies to all the outgoing message, including

> "REQUEST" and "REPLY" messages, in the addition of the new bandwidth 
> requirment. Is this a correct interpretation of the spec?
> 
> Clarence
> 
>