From zita at ISI.EDU Fri Apr 1 11:56:43 2005 From: zita at ISI.EDU (Zita Wenzel) Date: Fri Apr 1 11:58:51 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] [CORRECTION] Re: APRUNet DLPP Minutes and Proposal Message-ID: <424DA77B.6070802@isi.edu> Dear Colleagues, Apologies for the error in dates for the next teleconference. The correct dates should be: Tuesday the 19th and Wednesday the 20th: UTC Wednesday, April 20 01:00 (GMT/Zulu) Mexico City, Tuesday, April 19 19:00 GMT -10 Los Angeles/San Diego, Tuesday, April 19 17:00 GMT -8 Singapore Wednesday, April 20 09:00 GMT +8 Taipei Wednesday, April 20 09:00 GMT +8 Vladivostock Wednesday, April 20 11:00 GMT +10 Please include your taaching faculty members if at all possible. ==> Please indicate if you can make this phone call and if you need the APRU Secretariat to call out to you. ==> Please respond to Megan Harber's proposal (attached and in previous emails). We need to put together a concrete plan for this summer. One of the outcomes of the last teleconference was the idea that all of the partner universities did not have to be participating at the same time, but that we could have overlapping timelines. This will allow us to move forward to agree on the project (description of fish of different regions?), the technologies other videoconferencing (just email since not all partners use WebCT or Blackboard?), the specific dates (July/August? end date?), end results (a joint table? a joint paper?), and assessment (surveys?) at the next teleconference. Best regards, Zita -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Proposal APRUNet DLPP.doc Type: application/msword Size: 40448 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/apru-dlp/attachments/20050401/9ab7d14c/ProposalAPRUNetDLPP-0001.doc From falaleev at raf.dvgu.ru Fri Apr 1 16:51:47 2005 From: falaleev at raf.dvgu.ru (Alexei Falaleev) Date: Fri Apr 1 16:49:55 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] Re: APRUNet DLPP Minutes and Proposal In-Reply-To: <424CDF01.3080605@isi.edu> References: <42485EAF.2060709@isi.edu> <424CDF01.3080605@isi.edu> Message-ID: <127629123.20050402115147@raf.dvgu.ru> Hello Zita, This time is fine for us. Regards, Alexei Friday, April 1, 2005, 4:41:21 PM, you wrote: ZW> Dear Colleagues, ZW> Please confirm that you have received this message and that these ZW> teleconference dates and times are ok with you. ZW> Best regards, ZW> Zita ZW> Zita Wenzel wrote: >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> You should have received the minutes of the last DLPP teleconference >> on March 16/17 and also a proposal from Megan Harber of UCSD. >> >> Please comment on both the proposal and the proposed dates for the >> next teleconference which are: >> >> UTC Thursday, April 20 01:00 (GMT/Zulu) >> >> Mexico City, Wednesday, April 19 19:00 GMT -10 >> Los Angeles/San Diego, Wednesday, April 19 17:00 GMT -8 >> Singapore Thursday, April 20 09:00 GMT +8 >> Taipei Thursday, April 20 09:00 GMT +8 >> Vladivostock Thursday, April 20 11:00 GMT +10 >> >> Best regards, >> Zita >> >> _______________________________________________ >> APRU-DLI mailing list >> APRU-DLI@mailman.isi.edu >> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/apru-dli >> From zita at ISI.EDU Fri Apr 8 14:34:18 2005 From: zita at ISI.EDU (Zita Wenzel) Date: Fri Apr 8 14:33:31 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] Re: [CORRECTION] Re: APRUNet DLPP Minutes and Proposal In-Reply-To: <424DA77B.6070802@isi.edu> References: <424DA77B.6070802@isi.edu> Message-ID: <4256F8DA.6060705@isi.edu> Dear Colleagues, We have still not heard from each other on Megan's proposal. I think we should have a definite plan in place by May. Please also let me know if we can move the teleconference earlier by one hour. Sincerely, Zita Zita Wenzel wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > Apologies for the error in dates for the next teleconference. The > correct dates should be: > > Tuesday the 19th and Wednesday the 20th: > > UTC Wednesday, April 20 01:00 (GMT/Zulu) > > Mexico City, Tuesday, April 19 19:00 GMT -10 > Los Angeles/San Diego, Tuesday, April 19 17:00 GMT -8 > Singapore Wednesday, April 20 09:00 GMT +8 > Taipei Wednesday, April 20 09:00 GMT +8 > Vladivostock Wednesday, April 20 11:00 GMT +10 > > Please include your taaching faculty members if at all possible. > > ==> Please indicate if you can make this phone call and if you need > the APRU Secretariat to call out to you. > > ==> Please respond to Megan Harber's proposal (attached and in > previous emails). We need to put together a concrete plan for this > summer. One of the outcomes of the last teleconference was the idea > that all of the partner universities did not have to be participating > at the same time, but that we could have overlapping timelines. This > will allow us to move forward to agree on the project (description of > fish of different regions?), the technologies other videoconferencing > (just email since not all partners use WebCT or Blackboard?), the > specific dates (July/August? end date?), end results (a joint table? > a joint paper?), and assessment (surveys?) at the next teleconference. > > Best regards, > Zita From jdlemus at usc.edu Thu Apr 14 14:21:55 2005 From: jdlemus at usc.edu (Judy Lemus) Date: Thu Apr 14 14:22:58 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] Re: [CORRECTION] Re: APRUNet DLPP Minutes and Proposal In-Reply-To: <4256F8DA.6060705@isi.edu> Message-ID: Hello everyone, My apologies for joining this discussion a little late, and not being able to make the teleconferences yet. Zita and I finally had a very enjoyable call last week during which she was able to catch me up on the DLPP project. I'm very excited to be a part of this effort. Based on my understanding of the goals of this program, I thought I might offer another option for a cooperative distance learning project this summer. At the Wrigley Marine Science Center on Catalina, we have been using a monitoring system with our high school education programs that allows us to measure the heart rate of crabs with an infrared sensor. The system was developed by a group in Plymouth U.K. and basically uses the same technology as that for measuring heart rate in premature babies. The system is called "Computer-Aided Physiological Monitoring (CAPMON)". In a nutshell, CAPMON consists of an infrared emitter/detector sensor that can be easily glued onto the back of a crab. The sensor is removed at the end of the monitoring without harming the crabs, which can then be returned to the environment. The heart is dorsal in crabs so the light shines through the carapace, is reflected by the heart and returns to the detector. Changes in the shape of the heart will change the quality and quantity of the light that is returned. The sensor is attached to a unit that converts the light signal into a digital signal. Simple software converts this signal into a signwave pattern across a laptop computer connected to the CAPMON box. Each spike in the wave can be counted as a beat of the heart and the software calculates beats per minute. The CAPMON system has been used in the UK in studies of physiological indicators of water quality. There is a good correlation between the ability of a crab to maintain a sustained elevated heart rate during mild stress, such as constant motion, and the quality of the water from which they were taken. I have been using this system in our high school programs as a way for students to design and carry out a comparative laboratory experiment. Students collect the crabs themselves (we use shore crabs, Pachygrapsus crassipes), determine what variable they want to test, run the experiments, analyze the data, and present their data to their fellow students. A simple experiment can be completed in about 4 hours. We are not currently using the system for water quality assessment, but rather as a mechanism for collecting a range of physiological baseline data on the crabs. Students compare the heart rates of crabs under different temperatures, salinities, oxygen levels, light levels, etc. The initial impetus for this was an educational project called "Global Heartbeat", which was proposed by a distance education organization that we work with in Virginia to create a distance learning network in which students from different areas could share their data on local crabs with other groups and discuss their results. So far the networking piece has not come together for various reasons. But this would seem to fit nicely with the objectives of the DLPP. I could envision a program in which students conducted studies on their local crab species, in exactly the same type of process as proposed by Megan, and then could also actually conduct some experiments and share the data with each other. The limitation of this system is that it does require the CAPMON hardware and a laptop computer. We have been working with the group in Virginia to develop an educational CAPMON system that is much less expensive than the original. These are two channel units that can measure two crabs simultaneously. If this group were interested in such a project, I could check into the cost of these. However, there are also some units that we have loaned out to various teachers and education organizations that could be made available to this group -- we probably have enough for one unit per site (which is not ideal because you can only measure 2 crabs a time, but it would be a start!). Each site would need a laptop computer. I apologize for the length of this email! If you want to learn a little bit more about the concept of Global Heartbeat, you can check it out on the web at www.globalheartbeat.org. You can see pictures of the experimental setup under "Procedures". If there is interest, I can also send the protocols that I use for our summer programs. If the group would like to discuss this on the conference call next Tuesday, I can participate if the call could be rescheduled for an hour earlier. Best regards, Judy --------------------- Judith D. Lemus, Ph.D. Assistant Director of Education Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-0371 213-740-1965 voice/213-740-6720 fax jdlemus@usc.edu From jdlemus at usc.edu Fri Apr 15 14:14:38 2005 From: jdlemus at usc.edu (Judy Lemus) Date: Fri Apr 15 14:17:32 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] Re: [CORRECTION] Re: APRUNet DLPP Minutes and Proposal In-Reply-To: <4256F8DA.6060705@isi.edu> Message-ID: Hello everyone, My apologies for joining this discussion a little late, and not being able to make the teleconferences yet. Zita and I finally had a very enjoyable call last week during which she was able to catch me up on the DLPP project. I'm very excited to be a part of this effort. Based on my understanding of the goals of this program, I thought I might offer another option for a cooperative distance learning project this summer. At the Wrigley Marine Science Center on Catalina, we have been using a monitoring system with our high school education programs that allows us to measure the heart rate of crabs with an infrared sensor. The system was developed by a group in Plymouth U.K. and basically uses the same technology as that for measuring heart rate in premature babies. The system is called "Computer-Aided Physiological Monitoring (CAPMON)". In a nutshell, CAPMON consists of an infrared emitter/detector sensor that can be easily glued onto the back of a crab. The sensor is removed at the end of the monitoring without harming the crabs, which can then be returned to the environment. The heart is dorsal in crabs so the light shines through the carapace, is reflected by the heart and returns to the detector. Changes in the shape of the heart will change the quality and quantity of the light that is returned. The sensor is attached to a unit that converts the light signal into a digital signal. Simple software converts this signal into a signwave pattern across a laptop computer connected to the CAPMON box. Each spike in the wave can be counted as a beat of the heart and the software calculates beats per minute. The CAPMON system has been used in the UK in studies of physiological indicators of water quality. There is a good correlation between the ability of a crab to maintain a sustained elevated heart rate during mild stress, such as constant motion, and the quality of the water from which they were taken. I have been using this system in our high school programs as a way for students to design and carry out a comparative laboratory experiment. Students collect the crabs themselves (we use shore crabs, Pachygrapsus crassipes), determine what variable they want to test, run the experiments, analyze the data, and present their data to their fellow students. A simple experiment can be completed in about 4 hours. We are not currently using the system for water quality assessment, but rather as a mechanism for collecting a range of physiological baseline data on the crabs. Students compare the heart rates of crabs under different temperatures, salinities, oxygen levels, light levels, etc. The initial impetus for this was an educational project called "Global Heartbeat", which was proposed by a distance education organization that we work with in Virginia to create a distance learning network in which students from different areas could share their data on local crabs with other groups and discuss their results. So far the networking piece has not come together for various reasons. But this would seem to fit nicely with the objectives of the DLPP. I could envision a program in which students conducted studies on their local crab species, in exactly the same type of process as proposed by Megan, and then could also actually conduct some experiments and share the data with each other. The limitation of this system is that it does require the CAPMON hardware and a laptop computer. We have been working with the group in Virginia to develop an educational CAPMON system that is much less expensive than the original. These are two channel units that can measure two crabs simultaneously. If this group were interested in such a project, I could check into the cost of these. However, there are also some units that we have loaned out to various teachers and education organizations that could be made available to this group -- we probably have enough for one unit per site (which is not ideal because you can only measure 2 crabs a time, but it would be a start!). Each site would need a laptop computer. I apologize for the length of this email! If you want to learn a little bit more about the concept of Global Heartbeat, you can check it out on the web at www.globalheartbeat.org. You can see pictures of the experimental setup under "Procedures". If there is interest, I can also send the protocols that I use for our summer programs. If the group would like to discuss this on the conference call next Tuesday, I can participate if the call could be rescheduled for an hour earlier. Best regards, Judy --------------------- Judith D. Lemus, Ph.D. Assistant Director of Education Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-0371 213-740-1965 voice/213-740-6720 fax jdlemus@usc.edu From zita at ISI.EDU Fri Apr 15 15:29:27 2005 From: zita at ISI.EDU (Zita Wenzel) Date: Fri Apr 15 15:28:49 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] APRUNet DLPP Teleconference Message-ID: <42604047.8080600@isi.edu> Dear Colleagues, Could you please plan to attend our next DLPP conference call for: UTC Wednesday, April 20 23:00 (GMT/Zulu) Mexico City, Tuesday, April 19 18:00 GMT -10 Los Angeles/San Diego, Tuesday, April 19 16:00 GMT -8 Singapore Wednesday, April 20 07:00 GMT +8 Taipei Wednesday, April 20 07:00 GMT +8 Vladivostock Wednesday, April 20 10:00 GMT +10 Note that the time is earlier by one hour in several cities. Please also note that Daylight Savings Time is in effect in some areas. Please let me know if this time does not work for you. Please be prepared to discuss Megan Harber and Judy Lemus' proposals. Thank you. Best regards, Zita From zita at ISI.EDU Tue Apr 19 00:30:21 2005 From: zita at ISI.EDU (Zita Wenzel) Date: Tue Apr 19 00:32:44 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] Re: APRUNet DLPP Teleconference In-Reply-To: <42604047.8080600@isi.edu> References: <42604047.8080600@isi.edu> Message-ID: <4264B38D.6050509@isi.edu> Dear Colleagues, This is a reminder that our conference call will take place: UTC Tuesday, April 19 23:00 (GMT/Zulu) [note the correction here; city times and dates remain correct] Mexico City, Tuesday, April 19 18:00 GMT -10 Los Angeles/San Diego, Tuesday, April 19 16:00 GMT -8 Singapore Wednesday, April 20 07:00 GMT +8 Taipei Wednesday, April 20 07:00 GMT +8 Vladivostock Wednesday, April 20 10:00 GMT +10 Note that these times are one hour earlier and also take into account daylight savings times. Call in to: (+65) 6 668 7600. (Participants code: 373852 followed by the "#" key when prompted.) The call is being hosted by the APRU Secretariat. Please include your taaching faculty members if at all possible. AGENDA Please be prepared to discuss Megan Harber and Judy Lemus' proposals (attached). ==> Please indicate if you can make this phone call and if you need the APRU Secretariat to call out to you. ==> Please respond to Megan Harber's and Judy Lemus' proposals (attached and in previous emails). We need to put together a concrete plan for this summer. One of the outcomes of the last teleconference was the idea that all of the partner universities did not have to be participating at the same time, but that we could have overlapping timelines. This will allow us to move forward to agree on the project (description of fish of different regions?), the technologies other videoconferencing (just email since not all partners use WebCT or Blackboard?), the specific dates (July/August? end date?), end results (a joint table? a joint paper?), and assessment (surveys?) at the next teleconference. Best regards, Zita -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Proposal APRUNet DLPP-Lemus.doc Type: application/msword Size: 31744 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/apru-dlp/attachments/20050419/9a9a2fee/ProposalAPRUNetDLPP-Lemus-0001.doc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Proposal APRUNet DLPP-Harber UCSD.doc Type: application/msword Size: 40448 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/apru-dlp/attachments/20050419/9a9a2fee/ProposalAPRUNetDLPP-HarberUCSD-0001.doc From zita at ISI.EDU Fri Apr 22 13:41:41 2005 From: zita at ISI.EDU (Zita Wenzel) Date: Fri Apr 22 13:40:22 2005 Subject: [APRU-DLP] Minutes of APRUNet DLPP Call of 19/20 April 2005 Message-ID: <42696185.4030108@isi.edu> Dear Colleagues, Only Megan Harber, UCSD, and Judy Lemus, USC, were able to attend the 19/20 April DLPP teleconference. COULD FENU AND UNAM PLEASE RESPOND BY APRIL 30 AS TO WHETHER THE EXPANDED EXPERIMENT BELOW WOULD WORK FOR THEM? Otherwise, we will set Megan's experiment for this summer. Please note that I will be off-line through much of May (I am getting married). In any case, it is imperative for us to close on both the project and the logistics as soon as possible for partner schools and teachers to be able to implement the DLPP. I would like to set April 30 as the day to finalize on the project. The call was very productive. As per the agenda, we discussed the relative merits of Megan's and Judy's proposals. ==================== MINUTES OF 19/20 APRIL 2005 TELECONFERENCE 1. Megan Harber (UCSD) The classes would look at 5 variables (oceanography, biodiversity, ecological systems, temperature, environmental implications) on five different species of fish in different APRU partner locations. Each small group of students within a class would take a variable. We can do this now because it is a fairly simple descriptive study. We would not need to work synchronously; each school could work on their schedule and then we could coordinate presentation of results. Perhaps there could be partner schools such as UCSD and UNAM and USC and FENU? 2. Judy Lemus (USC) She is the West Coast Director of CAPMON http://www.coexploration.org/ http://www.globalheartbeat.org/html/introduction.html They currently have an experiment looking at different crab species hearbeats in an experimental paradigm. Perhaps we can use the same variables as Magan's? There is software and hardware that is needed that affixes to the crab's back to non-invasively monitor hear rate under different conditions. This equipment may require funding for the hardware. Because of that, and because it is more difficult due to its experimental nature, Zita suggested that perhaps it should be the next project after Megan's? Megan liked Judy's proposal very much and suggested they integrate them. She can find crab species and can tailor her class. In response to Zita's cost of equipment question, Judy stated that she thinks she can get three more loaner units, but she will check (schools would need to have their own laptop running Windows XP). Each unit is 2 channel and monitors 2 crabs at a time. The units could be rotated throughout the class. The most labor intensive part of setting it up is to collect the crabs, attach the monitors, and set up the protocol. Long battery life on the laptop is helpful. Each experiment would be one hour. The crabs are not disturbed and can last about one week. There is a box to glued leads, Windows XP, and software. Aquariums can be 5 gallons, or even smaller like a shoe box or buckets with bubblers or tide pools. A high school teacher can set it up easily. There is a 1-2 page instruction sheet that Zita suggested should be translated into Spanish and Russian. Judy only has an 8 day class, so is going to check in with us later; there are 25 students in her class. Zita suggested that if Judy cannot locate loaner units, if her class will not work within 8 days, or if FENU and/or UNAM can't join in, that we delay this project for the next DLPP. [N.B. Judy was able to locate loaner units for each partner university.] Regarding reporting: A web site does exist on the CAPMON web sites; they would also need to be thanked. Judy suggested an online conference instead of an in-person conference. The Global Hearbeat project uses CAUCUS, but it is licensed. Zita suggested that maybe we could put it on the APRU web site? 3. Other issues - Set timelines and end date - Technologies (Videoconferencing, email, lists, chat). If partners use WebCT or Blackboard, they could use them. - Presentation of results - Paper? Table? Zita suggested an in-person student conference (with APRU funding)? Judy suggested an on-line conference. - Assessment - preferably not long survey, but maybe three free-form questions (Did you find it useful? Would you do it again? What would be better?). Results could also be posted on the APRU DLPP web site. ACTION ITEMS Judy - will check on loaners, instructions, software, and her class time Megan - will check on whether she can get aquarium space Zita - will check with FENU and UNAM, explore the CAUCUS software, posting of the conference and results on the APRU site UNAM - respond! FENU - respond! PLEASE let me know if FENU and UNAM can participate in this project? I suggest as the PROJECT PARAMETERS: 1. Project "Global Heatbeat of Crabs from different APRU regions" A project of APRU partner high school students with faculty members working in collaborative international teams. 2. Project timeline UCSD July 10-31 USC July 28-August 04 FENU ?? UNAM ?? 3. Technology Specialized heartbeat hardware and software that allows remote data collection. Inter-class communication and result sharing via email, videoconferencing (Zita will maintain), chat, and on-line synchronous software. 4. Results Posted on APRU DLPP web site. Shared via on-line conference. 5. Assessment Short on-line survey (see above) with follow-up (since students will be on different time schedules). Post results on the APRU DLPP web site. ==================== PLEASE COMMENT AND LET US ALL KNOW IF WE CAN MOVE AHEAD WITH THIS. I think it is a very exciting project with the addition of the hearbeat technology that would also teach the students about technology-enabled data collection and reporting. Best regards, Zita From zita at ISI.EDU Fri Apr 22 13:51:20 2005 From: zita at ISI.EDU (Zita Wenzel) Date: Fri Apr 22 13:58:59 2005 Subject: [Fwd: Re: [APRU-DLP] Re: APRUNet DLPP Teleconference] Message-ID: <426963C8.5040100@isi.edu> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [APRU-DLP] Re: APRUNet DLPP Teleconference Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:11:44 -0700 From: Judy Lemus To: Zita Wenzel CC: meegharb@yahoo.com Hi Zita and Megan, Here are the URLs for College of Exploration and Global Heartbeat http://www.coexploration.org/ http://www.globalheartbeat.org/html/introduction.html Also attached are the protocols for the larger 8-channel CAPMON unit (this is the one I use at Catalina) and a simplified lab setup. The protocols for the 2-channel units are actually much simpler because the software has been updated and many things are automated. Loading the software, running the program and accessing the data are now even easier (I can show you this in person). For some reason I just can't find those protocols right now - I will have to ask my colleagues at College of Exploration. But this will give you an idea. Judy On 4/19/05 12:30 AM, "Zita Wenzel" wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > This is a reminder that our conference call will take place: > > UTC Tuesday, April 19 23:00 (GMT/Zulu) [note the correction here; city > times and dates remain correct] > > Mexico City, Tuesday, April 19 18:00 GMT -10 > Los Angeles/San Diego, Tuesday, April 19 16:00 GMT -8 > Singapore Wednesday, April 20 07:00 GMT +8 > Taipei Wednesday, April 20 07:00 GMT +8 > Vladivostock Wednesday, April 20 10:00 GMT +10 > > Note that these times are one hour earlier and also take into account > daylight savings times. > > Call in to: > > (+65) 6 668 7600. (Participants code: 373852 followed by the "#" key when > prompted.) The call is being hosted by the APRU Secretariat. Please include > your taaching faculty members if at all possible. > > AGENDA > > Please be prepared to discuss Megan Harber and Judy Lemus' proposals > (attached). > > ==> Please indicate if you can make this phone call and if you need the > APRU Secretariat to call out to you. > > ==> Please respond to Megan Harber's and Judy Lemus' proposals (attached > and in previous emails). We need to put together a concrete plan for > this summer. One of the outcomes of the last teleconference was the > idea that all of the partner universities did not have to be > participating at the same time, but that we could have overlapping > timelines. This will allow us to move forward to agree on the project > (description of fish of different regions?), the technologies other > videoconferencing (just email since not all partners use WebCT or > Blackboard?), the specific dates (July/August? end date?), end results > (a joint table? a joint paper?), and assessment (surveys?) at the next > teleconference. > > Best regards, > Zita > > _______________________________________________ > APRU-DLP mailing list > APRU-DLP@mailman.isi.edu > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/apru-dlp --------------------- Judith D. Lemus, Ph.D. Assistant Director of Education Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-0371 213-740-1965 voice/213-740-6720 fax jdlemus@usc.edu -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CAPMONprotocols2.doc Type: application/msword Size: 42496 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/apru-dlp/attachments/20050422/4fb83750/CAPMONprotocols2-0001.doc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GSC CAPMON LAB Type: application/msword Size: 47104 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/apru-dlp/attachments/20050422/4fb83750/GSCCAPMONLAB-0001.dot