Release 5.2 is now available
Tue, 2 Sep 1997 11:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
> >Also, as Bill Manning has pointed out the two addressing formats will
> >co-exist in the 6bone for a while.
> The goal is to move away from the old address format as quickly as
> possible. In reality it should be what the 6bone community agrees on, and I
> haven't heard much yet on this from the mailer.
Hum. A goal for some will be to move from one address format to another.
As I understand, both types remain valid and ought to be accepted.
The IPv4 analogy I might use here is:
"People must renumber all the hosts in the 1-126 range
and go to the 192 range since the 192 range has CIDR
support and the 1-126 does not."
Or is there something else going on here?